Planning panel backs Bywater condos
But opponents cite traffic, parking fears
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
By Bruce Eggler
- Times-Picayune
To opponents, it's an unsightly, out-of-scale behemoth that would
wreak havoc on Bywater's traffic, parking and drainage and threaten
the neighborhood's somewhat raffish, unconventional character. To supporters, it's an environmentally sensitive, neighborhood-friendly
engine for economic development that could be the catalyst for a
dying district's rebirth. For weeks, arguments over the merits of a proposed 240,000-square-foot,
105-unit condominium development in the heart of Bywater have divided
residents, even leading to the creation of an upstart rival to the
neighborhood's longtime resident organization. On Tuesday, the City Planning Commission threw its support behind
the proposed complex, known as ICInola. Despite hearing impassioned arguments against every aspect of the
proposal from more than a dozen Bywater residents, the commission
voted 6-0 to endorse plans for the complex and send them to the
City Council. The site is in Councilman James Carter's district, and the council
is likely to follow his recommendation in deciding whether to give
the project a green light. A Web
site created by the project's developers promises that ICInola "will
signal a return to the time-honored tradition of a walkable,
sustainable community that includes shops and services while embracing
modern design and environmentally friendly building practices." The
opponents' Web site lists a dozen reasons residents should resist
the project, including that the proposed buildings are too big
for a neighborhood of predominantly single-story houses, "will
lead to . . . loss of street/neighborhood character" and "are
extremely modern in appearance and do not adequately blend in
with the surrounding neighborhood." Developers
Shea Embry and Carolyn "Cam" Mangham
propose redeveloping four separate sites, one at each corner
of the intersection of Bartholomew and Burgundy streets, including
the former LA. Frey meat packing plant and a former Social Security
Administration office building. The site totals 2.76 acres, and the completed complex would comprise
105 condos costing $250,000 and more, 210 off-street parking spaces
and 34,662 square feet of commercial and community-center space. The buildings would be contemporary in appearance and would be
designed to minimize energy usage through devices such as solar
panels and rooftop gardens. Bywater is a local historic district,
and the Historic District Landmarks Commission has approved the
building designs. The former Frey plant would be incorporated into a new five-story
building with 53 condos and a two-level, 54-space garage. The old
Social Security building would be demolished and replaced by a four-story
building with 14 condos and a 16-space parking lot. On the third corner, a former office and garage for the Frey plant
would be demolished to make room for a four-story building with
19 condos and a two-level, 63-space garage. On the final corner,
two single-family shotgun houses would be relocated to nearby lots
and a four-story building with 19 condos and a two-level, 69-space
garage would be built. All four buildings also would have space for offices, restaurants
and other retail uses, such as a grocery, a coffeehouse, a gallery
and a health club, though no commercial tenants have committed to
the project. Critic cites Wal-Mart One
of the project's harshest critics, Beth Butler, told the City
Planning Commission that ICInola would be "outrageously disproportionate" in
scale, would dwarf nearby homes and would be equivalent in square
feet to a Wal-Mart Supercenter. Embry said the Wal-Mart comparison is invalid because the project
would be divided among four buildings with streets between them.
She said she and Mangham chose to reduce the number of proposed
condos in response to neighborhood pressure. Embry
and other proponents said Bywater has only about half as many
residents now as in the 1960s and needs a project such as ICInola
to spur its redevelopment. French Quarter hotelier Michael Valentino
called the developers' plans "bold, visionary and appropriate," and
residents including Carolyn Leftwich, Shelton Pollet and Bill
Sweeney expressed strong support. New group forms The Bywater Neighborhood Association, founded in 1975, has endorsed
ICInola, though it has called for a reduction in density, but a
rival group, the Bywater Civic Association, founded in October,
has been leading the fight against the project. Andrea Garland said
the new group has about 100 members, compared with 185 for the older
one. Garland and other opponents including Denise Heston-Taylor, Meredith
Spivey, Rose Mary Eagan and David Leonard raised a long list of
objections: the buildings' size and appearance, the number of residential
units, increased traffic, lack of parking, and fears of noise and
damage to nearby buildings during construction. Leonard
said the project would "drastically change the face" and
the voting demographics of a "Bohemian paradise" by
bringing in scores of well-to-do outsiders who would not appreciate
Bywater's charm or history. But
the Planning Commission's staff recommended approving the ICInola
plans, saying it "recognizes the impact this change would have
on the surrounding neighborhood but believes that . . . the benefits
of the proposed development will outweigh the potential negative
effects." The staff recommended requiring just 210 parking
spaces, 67 fewer than the zoning law would normally require. Commissioner
Lou Volz, who made the motion to approve the plans, said he had
some concerns about the project but added that "change
is inevitable" and that overall the project should have
a positive economic impact. Voting with him were Kelly Brown,
Lois Carlos-Lawrence, Lester Johnson, Ed Robinson and Poco Sloss. |